View Full Version : Sadam Hoosame VS Osama Bin Laden
Troop_zer0
10-31-2002, 05:20 PM
who do you hate more Sadam Hoosame or Osama Bin Laden
Pretty pointless but ....Bin Laden!!!
CyBeR XxX
10-31-2002, 06:19 PM
I will have to say Bin Laden!
Colt .45
10-31-2002, 08:33 PM
saddam........but i do h8 bin laden...i mean, although bin laden in a terrorist i think saddam has done a lot worse...like killing all his oponents in the election....
L*O*K*I098
11-01-2002, 02:58 PM
must agree with Clot .45
Originally posted by Colt .45
saddam........but i do h8 bin laden...i mean, although bin laden in a terrorist i think saddam has done a lot worse...like killing all his oponents in the election....
bah binladen is a **********ing ********** (BEEP BEEP BEEP) ************************************************** ************:cussing: :cussing: :cussing: :cussing:
bin laden should die.. i hate him A LOT more than Sadam cuz all he ever did was lie to us (oh ya and start that pointless war that no one even remembers nemore) but I HATE him for the fact of what 9/11 ended up to be. Never can I remember it to be the 13th Home Ecanomics Class that I had at school on a tuesday morning (the moment I heard of the planes crashing into the WTC). Now I have to remember it as my parents and grandparents breaking up in tears watching the buildings colapse, and the time that my dad didn't get home til VERY late because he was stuck in the middle of traffic for 12 hours. Simply put, I hate Bin Laden more than the devil. :mad:
Zafiras
11-03-2002, 03:43 PM
they are as bad as one another... they should both be drawn and quartered for their acts and potential acts
Originally posted by Aman9090
bin laden should die.. i hate him A LOT more than Sadam cuz all he ever did was lie to us (oh ya and start that pointless war that no one even remembers nemore) but I HATE him for the fact of what 9/11 ended up to be.
a pointless war that no one evan remembers anymore huh? you were probably in diapers when it all happened so you probably wont remember the importance of Hussain being stopped then... you should never call Desert Storm (seeing you dont remember it, that was the name of it) pointless cos if not for the US and UN stopping Iraq when they did, who knows what could have happened... Kuwait first... then what???
im not saying Bin Laden is an angel... just dont ever underestimate Hussain.... as well as history!
yup. I WAS in diapers... well... hm... maybe a little out of em... too young to remember... but anywayz... i didnt mean it that way.. i was just stating something to go along with my opinion.. I mean, desert storm (gulf war possibly?) was an important part of history, but I think September the 11th had a much more terrible effect on not only the united states, but the whole world, and everyone that respects the American culture. I live right next to new york city, about an hour away, and my dad works there. It was TRETCHORY, 9/11, and it effected the New England area so much. I nearly got so emotional as to making a hate site for osama bin laden. It really effected me in ways i didnt know possible.
doughboy
11-04-2002, 05:22 AM
better the devil you know
usa goverment..
5m civilians killed so far.. all those dead ppl for ? oil, power.. etc
Revelation
11-20-2002, 12:28 AM
Originally posted by vax
usa goverment..
5m civilians killed so far.. all those dead ppl for ? oil, power.. etc
I thought it was so we could build more golf courses... :D
I think Osama & Sadam are gay lovers. :love:
«·X·CÅLÏßÜR·»
11-20-2002, 12:30 AM
Originally posted by vax
usa goverment..
5m civilians killed so far.. all those dead ppl for ? oil, power.. etc
uh huh
Troop_Zer0
11-20-2002, 07:32 AM
lol gewd 1 Copy Lord
Rocky
11-20-2002, 07:39 AM
download. Weird Al Yankovic - Lets Bomb Iraq. Funny. So with that i say So Dam Insain.
LoneWolf19
11-20-2002, 07:41 AM
I hate bin laden, I wish I could be the one to look him square in the eyes and put him out of his misery for all the people hurt on 9/11.
Troop_Zer0
11-20-2002, 08:05 AM
i woudnt kill him kause im christian i would just lock him up in a small cage wid not much food or drink :):):)
hitek303
11-20-2002, 09:18 AM
I don't hate Osama or Sadaam because they haven't done anything to me. I'm neutral and non-violent. Violence is not the answer.
i woudnt kill him kause im christian i would just lock him up in a small cage wid not much food or drink
Also, starving is not the answer, forgiveness is.
Rocky
11-20-2002, 09:25 AM
why dont they bomb them both. if they bombed them both then you wouldn't need to worry about them atacking us. I know that would make the U.S. look bad but then it would help all of the people that sit at home and do nothing because of fear. (not the old people. there not fearing osam or husain there scard that the nerse will come and give them there shots). I also know that some people have been growing up to the saying "If you got nothing good to say then don't say anything at all" but were would we all be if we didn't stad up for our selfs. thank thats what i have to say.
Zafiras
11-20-2002, 03:39 PM
can you lay off the glow m8, makes it hard to read
philman132
11-21-2002, 01:00 AM
Originally posted by RRKY
why dont they bomb them both. if they bombed them both then you wouldn't need to worry about them atacking us. I know that would make the U.S. look bad but then it would help all of the people that sit at home and do nothing because of fear. (not the old people. there not fearing osam or husain there scard that the nerse will come and give them there shots). I also know that some people have been growing up to the saying "If you got nothing good to say then don't say anything at all" but were would we all be if we didn't stad up for our selfs. thank thats what i have to say.
2 points here, firstly, we cant bomb bin laden, cos we dont know where he is :doh: :doh:
also, even if we do get rid of saddam and bin laden, there will always be other terrorist groups, britain has the IRA, spain has ETA, more terrorist groups will spring up from the ashes of old ones. this will not solve peoples fear, instead of bombing anyone who looks like they may threaten the US, we should seek to find out why they want to threaten the US.
Troop_Zer0
11-21-2002, 01:15 PM
never thought of the other terrorist groups!!!
Ewok_warrior
11-21-2002, 05:57 PM
there are varying degrees of evil, and i think it is safe to say that both these forms of filth have crossed the line and declared themselves not only truly heinous monsters, but amongst the most base forms of life on the planet, in the words of stickdeath -alqaeda-cam
"they aren't even human F***ing beings"
CyBeR XxX
11-21-2002, 06:27 PM
I KNOW THIS IS OUT OF TOPIC
but to any admin have u seen the profile of troop zero he registered the 11-20-02 n he has an average of 325 post per day n he has 502 posts already. isn't that called spaming the forums?
rogueingreen
11-21-2002, 06:47 PM
@ SCYRAXXX, i may be wrong but i think he's one of the people who have re-registered to get his points total working and has been given his old post count back.
CyBeR XxX
11-21-2002, 08:53 PM
umm i don't think so.
http://216.127.84.110/forums/search.php?s=&action=finduser&userid=3937 look at one of his posts it says i only spamed once.
Gee Gee
11-21-2002, 11:23 PM
Troop_Zer0 did reregister look up at the first post in this thread it says guest for him. Can we keep this thread on topic please.
philman132
11-22-2002, 12:49 AM
ive seen Troop-Zer0 on mgforums before yesterday, so i beleve gg
CyBeR XxX
11-22-2002, 01:08 AM
if u say so ok i believe u gg :)
ldoodle
11-22-2002, 04:42 AM
Posted by philman132
we should seek to find out why they want to threaten the US.
That's easy... America are probably the most powerful country in the world. From a terrorist point of view, who would you attack?
«·X·CÅLÏßÜR·»
11-22-2002, 04:48 AM
America have a hell of alot more Weapons of Mass destruction compared to Iraq, so i find it very hypocrytical in some respects.
and check this out : with Bush more Trigger Happy than Ever, im very much concerned http://www.cnn.com/2002/EDUCATION/11/20/geography.quiz/index.html
philman132
11-23-2002, 12:47 AM
Originally posted by ldoodle
That's easy... America are probably the most powerful country in the world. From a terrorist point of view, who would you attack?
oh, so one day osama just felt a bit bored, thought, 'hmm, i know ill join a terrorist organisation' and then think ' hmm, who shall i attack frirst, shall it be a small country who's weak armies cant fight back very well, or shall i attack the most powerful country in the world, knowing full well that they will gain allies, and come to afghanistan with 10 armies with them?' they fight america because they hate the american way, and think that america is polluting the world, (which it is, over 25% of all greenhouse gasses come from the USA alone), not because america is the most powerful country in the world.
America have a hell of alot more Weapons of Mass destruction compared to Iraq, so i find it very hypocrytical in some respects.[/B]
good point, i know that people will say that america is more responsible, but who can we judge before judging ourselves?
Demonic
11-23-2002, 06:17 AM
exactly, The usa probably has the largest stockpile of WOMD in the fuggin WORLD, yes each time some contry like india gets a bomb, it's big news and the usa wants to invade them to take it away, how hyprocritical is that. we can have them but you can't. sometimes i thin the world would've been better off with gore in charge
SuBzErO
11-23-2002, 06:27 AM
Ok the reason bush wants to rid iraq of nucklear missles is because what if the allie with bin laden what then? Saddam would defiantly use thos weapons to fight the us and the only way to prevent that is riding him of his weapons of mass destruction.
Demonic
11-23-2002, 06:44 AM
Give me a break, the only reason George Dubaya wants Iraq is the oil. he probably made up **** about saddam and Iraq just to give him reason to go in. :rolleyes:
Commander 598
11-23-2002, 07:41 AM
The US's stockpile like Russia's is made ip mostly of leftovers from the Cold War.
The reason we don't want to let Saddam get a Long Range weapon is because, if he will continue to shoot at UN/NATO Patrol Aircraft, he will target a major city in either America, Britain, or Israel.
the only reason George Dubaya wants Iraq is the oil
We don't need Iraq's oil. We got enough from Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and Texas.
I'd almost be willing to say we got a surplus of oil.
SnipeR_X
11-23-2002, 08:47 AM
i dont believe it
this thread was pretty pointless and people are still posting to it
philman132
11-24-2002, 01:29 AM
Originally posted by Commander 598
The reason we don't want to let Saddam get a Long Range weapon is because, if he will continue to shoot at UN/NATO Patrol Aircraft, he will target a major city in either America, Britain, or Israel.
We don't need Iraq's oil. We got enough from Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and Texas.
I'd almost be willing to say we got a surplus of oil.
firstly, iraq shoots at american aircraft because the american aircraft are bombing the people of iraq, how come there's no coverage of that on TV?
america doesnt have enough oil to supply itself, true, it has alot, but not enough to completly supply itself
I don't hate Osama or Sadaam because they haven't done anything to me. I'm neutral and non-violent. Violence is not the answer.
No. For this type of violence and hatred, there is NO OTHER solution than JUSTICE - NOT VIOLENCE. Violence is not the answer when it comes to senseless violence and punching someone for calling you gay... but THIS.. if we kill Osama, it would be JUSTICE. But the first thing that we would do is probably have some other country TORTURE binladen, but then WE WOULD KILL HIM... making it JUSTICE.
Secondly, we have enough oil to get around for a year or two... but remember, we, the USA have friends in just as high places as us. England is our best friend country and they have plenty of oil that they would supply us with, and Suadi Arabia also is the biggest and best distrubitor of oil, and they would gladdly give us some. Also, Canada would give us some. We would NOT BE IN TROUBLE if that happened.
exactly, The usa probably has the largest stockpile of WOMD in the fuggin WORLD, yes each time some contry like india gets a bomb, it's big news and the usa wants to invade them to take it away, how hyprocritical is that. we can have them but you can't. sometimes i thin the world would've been better off with gore in charge
Maybe you would like to know WHY we have all those weapons? MAYBE ITS BECAUSE THAT WE KNOW HOW TO USE THEM PROPERLY. Yes, we sometimes take our overwhelming power for granted, but we SAVE MILLIONS OF LIVES WITH IT. Imagine what would have happened if we hadn't ended WW2 with those bombs, and imagine what would happen if we didnt bomb up Afghanastan. More countries including the US would be hurt by terrorism and terrible things would happen. Who do you think has better control and has WOMD in better hands? Terrorists or the best damn country (and the most powerful at that) in the world, the good ol' USA?
Commander 598
11-24-2002, 06:31 AM
firstly, iraq shoots at american aircraft because the american aircraft are bombing the people of iraq, how come there's no coverage of that on TV?
1. You really need to learn capitilization.
2. Its not just American aircraft, its YOU Brits to.
3. We DON'T bomb Iraq's people. I'd love to see some proof that we do. We patrol a NO-FLY ZONE.
Demonic
11-25-2002, 10:40 AM
please tell me how you'd use a weapon of mass destruction "properly", aside from dismantling it of course
bloodArvil
11-25-2002, 11:08 AM
Osama bin smokin 4 me
Ewok_warrior
11-25-2002, 02:05 PM
has anyone else noticed that he spelt saddams name wrong? i was just wondering
philman132
11-28-2002, 01:28 AM
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/jul2002/iraq-j16.shtml
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/09/18/1032054822260.html
here are some web pages with details of the bombing raids on iraq, admittidly there were british planes there too, but thats tony blair for you
theres no point in capitals in this kind of forum, as long as the message gets accross, thats all that matters
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.